UKGC Postpones Decision on Financial Risk Assessments

(AsiaGameHub) –   Following a review of evidence during its 21 May board meeting, the UK Gambling Commission has pushed back its final ruling on Financial Risk Assessments. These checks are a component of the 2023 Gambling Act white paper reforms, and remain among the most controversial elements of the UK’s betting policy agenda.

---

Good to Know

• The UKGC is yet to set a new timetable for its final FRA decision.
• The pilot program launched in August 2024 and was built to flag potential cases of gambling-related financial harm.
• Racing organizations, MPs, betting operators and legal professionals have all raised concerns over the policy.

---

UKGC Allocates Additional Time to Evaluate FRA Evidence

Even after its board discussed the topic at the 21 May meeting, the Gambling Commission is not prepared to approve the full rollout of Financial Risk Assessments.

In an official statement, the regulator shared:

“[UKGC] was provided with a comprehensive body of evidence but has not yet fully finished its assessment of these materials. We will share further updates in due course.”

This postponement leaves betting operators, racing bodies and campaign groups waiting for clarity on one of the most sensitive UK gambling reform measures.

FRAs first launched as a pilot in August 2024. The Gambling Commission has stated the checks are designed to identify high-risk gambling activity and possible financial harm, rather than impose fixed spending limits on customers. Per the regulator, 97% of active customers will go through a seamless check process, while only 3% will trigger additional intervention.

However, the term “frictionless” has done little to ease widespread concerns across the sector. Bettors, operators and racing leaders have raised doubts over whether credit reference data can function as intended, whether customers will accept the process, and if stricter checks could push some users to unlicensed betting platforms.

The close connection between British betting and horseracing sits at the core of the dispute. Earlier this week, cross-party MPs urged Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy to scrap the policy, warning that affordability-style checks could damage racing revenue during a challenging period for the sport.

The Gambling Commission continues to reject that characterization. Ian Angus, the regulator’s director of policy, told a Clarion Payments Providers event:

“Financial Risk Assessments are not affordability checks under a different name – the checks we have been piloting will not even attempt to evaluate how much each customer can afford to gamble”.

Tim Miller, executive director at the Gambling Commission, also told the April Ethical Gambling Forum that operators will not be required to ask customers for extra financial documents, such as bank statements, following an FRA.

Customer trust remains a persistent issue, however. A YouGov survey published by the Betting and Gaming Council found that 65% of UK bettors would refuse to share personal financial documents if required to do so to keep placing bets.

Sophie Kemp, partner and head of public law at Kingsley Napley, said the delay confirms that unresolved issues remain in place.

“The Gambling Commission had already acknowledged unanswered questions about the reliability of credit reference data, inconvenience for customers and the risk of pushing users to unregulated black-market operators. The board’s decision to delay affordability checks suggests that pilot evidence has not resolved these widely feared industry concerns,” Kemp said.

She added:

“The Gambling Commission cannot move forward with a decision of this scale without a reasonable assessment of its impacts – and if it does proceed anyway, the grounds for judicial review will likely be very strong.”

For the time being, UK operators have no confirmed final FRA rollout date. The regulator says further assessment work must be completed before it arrives at a final decision.